4/1001 Bradburian Nights
![]() |
| An excerpt from 'The Mathematican's Lament' |
What an essay! So much applies to Charlotte Mason's approach to education. Lockhart makes some incredible statements right off the bat:
"...if I had to design a mechanism for the express purpose of destroying a child's natural curiosity and love of pattern-making, I couldn't possibly do as good a job as is currently being done [by our present system of mathematics education] -- I simply wouldn't have the imagination to come up with the kind of senseless, soul-crushing ideas that constitute contemporary mathematics education."
Well, at least we can't accuse him of holding anything back.
There is a lot more where that came from. It's not merely an essay; it is truly a lament, a lover’s lament. It is an elegy as well as a scathing accusation against the way the standard institutional educational system has handled - or, to quote Lockhart, how it has “openly and cruelly tortured” - mathematics. See the quote above as well as quotes like this:
"...it is so heartbreaking to see what is being done to mathematics in school. This rich and fascinating adventure of the imagination has been reduced to a sterile set of "facts" to be memorized and procedures to be followed."
And this:
"Now let me be clear about what I'm objecting to. It's not about formulas, or memorizing interesting facts. That's fine in context, and has its place just as learning a vocabulary does -- it helps you to create richer, more nuanced art. But it's not the fact that triangles take up half their box that matters. What matters is the beautiful idea of chopping it with the line, and how that might inspire other beautiful ideas and lead to creative breakthroughs in other problems— something a mere statement of fact can never give you."By removing the creative process and leaving only the results of that process, you virtually guarantee that no one will have any real engagement with the subject. It is like saying that Michelangelo created a beautiful sculpture, without letting me see it. How am I supposed to be inspired by that? (And of course it’s actually much worse than this— at least it’s understood that there is an art of sculpture that I am being prevented from appreciating).
And this about teaching:
"If teaching is reduced to mere data transmission, if there is no sharing of excitement and wonder, if teachers themselves are passive recipients of information and not creators of new ideas, what hope is there for their students? ... Teaching is not about information. It's about having an honest intellectual relationship with your students. It requires no method, no tools, and no training. Just the ability to be real. And if you can't be real, you have no right to inflict yourself upon innocent children. …"Teaching means openness and honesty, an ability to share excitement and a love of learning. Without these, all the education degrees in the world won't help you, and with them they are completely unnecessary."
Let's take moment to catch our breath.
A Mathematican's Lament is an impassioned plea to give math - actual mathematics, the "art of explanation" - a chance. As much as I love an eloquently phrased jab at industrial education, I love even more to hear an amateur (from Latin amator ‘lover’, from amare ‘to love') - even an expert amateur (amateur expert?) - wax eloquent about what they love, and at length, if possible. To hear an amateur speak about their passion is to risk being convinced that you have seen whatever it is they are praising all wrong - that maybe you have never actually seen it at all - and to find that you are not only intrigued but that you want to learn more for yourself - indeed, that you must, you need, to learn more as soon as possible! The entire essay is an ode in praise of the Beauty of Mathematics, a meditation on the loveliness of this much-maligned art, and a call to reconsider our entire approach: "The first thing to understand is that mathematics is an Art.... Mathematics is the purest of the arts, as well as the most misunderstood." It reminds me of Cinderella, and Lockhart is the prince who sees through the insitutional rags we've made her wear to the beauteous and virtuous maid waiting patiently beneath.
To read Lockhart's lament is to become convinced that you have never experienced Mathematics at all and to find yourself lamenting your loss. I think that now, I might understand Edna St. Vincent Millay's sonnet a bit better:
Let all who prate of Beauty hold their peace,
And lay them prone upon the earth and cease
To ponder on themselves, the while they stare
At nothing, intricately drawn nowhere
In shapes of shifting lineage; let geese
Gabble and hiss, but heroes seek release
From dusty bondage into luminous air.
O blinding hour, O holy, terrible day,
When first the shaft into his vision shone
Of light anatomized! Euclid alone
Has looked on Beauty bare. Fortunate they
Who, though once only and then but far away,
![]() |
| Our tired tree, still standing but beginning to droop |


Comments
Post a Comment